The Fight has Just Begun

As the bile begins to rise, I look at our campaign for liberty and Ron Paul for President and I get angry at what has become of my country. What happened? What went wrong? How did we get this far into the hole?

A recap:

- We have a communist president.
- We have a communist front runner for the Republican Party presidential nomination to challenge said communist president.
- We have even more wars than we did under our previous president (and that is saying something...)
- We have less individual rights and more possibility of indefinite detention without representation.
- Our Constitution has been shredded...
- Supposed conservatives are jumping on the Romney bandwagon and have failed to actually think for themselves (how is that Kool-aid by the way?)

I will vote my conscience in the next election. I will not be accountable for the Sheeple's choice for president. I will vote for the only guy who actually represents most of my values. I will not vote for one of the choices that the media and the Sheeple say I have to choose from.

 Having said all of that, I am actually pleased about where we are in many ways...

- We have infiltrated the system and have begun to change it from within. We have used the Left's process of "Fight Back" campaigning (get inside by stealth and then take over) on our pseudo-conservative party and begun to cause real change. Iowa anyone?
- We have begun to take over at the local level in politics.
- We have begun to shear the sheeple and open their eyes to the truth...the truth that says you have not had a choice in candidates since Reagan.
- We are changing the game from the ground up.

So...what now?

I say the delegates vote in the first round at the RNC according to their conscience. I say we take the RNC and rip it out of the establishment's hands and then kick them out. And if we can't do that in this round, we keep fighting through the next elections and raise up our children to do the same. We have not lost this fight - far from it. We are in a war made up of many battles. Some states lost those battles in this presidential contest, but many won. And the one's that lost will have another chance in 4 years.

Gear up - don't quit and have a strategy in place before this election is even over. Keep up the fight - the war is at it's beginning. Take the long view and continue to take over locally and expand from there. Soon the establishment will be on quick sand - it is already happening. But whatever you do - don't quit! The fight has just begun!

Romney and Obama - the Same Candidate

The Lesser of Two Weevils...

When I was a kid, my grandfather was my hero.  He had all kinds of little sayings that would just crack me up.  Sure, he indulged in the low-brow "pull my finger" humor (any good grandfather will), but he also could turn a phrase with the best of them.  One day I had a choice to make and I did not like either choice.  He told me, "You will simply have to pick the lesser of two weevils..."  It took me a second to catch the play on words.  After that it was a paroxysm of laughter. 

Well, my political friends - we are being told by fellow, well meaning Republicans that if we don't like Romney, at least it will be better than Obama.  In other words, on election day we will have the opportunity (once again) to pick the lesser of two weevils.  As long as you hold your nose, it won't smell as bad...

If you are like me, you are fed up with the media telling you who your nominee is eight months before the convention.  You are probably also sick of the half baked attempts by worthless candidates to model Dr. Paul's ideas in their speeches (and then claim that they have always held those positions).  But the thing I am most tired of is people telling me that they don't want to vote for someone unless they can win. 

The idea behind this is that if the "Republican" nominee is someone who "can win," then that is who you "can" vote for.  In other words, don't let that whole notion that you might vote for someone who actually knows the economy, has a workable plan to cut $1 trillion dollars from the budget in his first year and wants you to be able to choose how you want to live your life (read that: "Liberty") get in the way of you voting for "the guy who can win." 

Well, readers, let's see what a "winner" looks like (according to modern day pundits and uneducated voters)...

The current choice of a "candidate that can win" that the press is allowing you to have is (right now) Romney. 

Mitt Romney (R), a former Massachusetts governor, who often poses as a conservative has many views that are perfectly aligned with President Obama’s. During the 2008 Presidential election, Romney’s socialist views weren’t the focus of debate, but now that he is running for the Republican nomination in 2012, they're obvious when compared with Obama’s. In regards to gun rights, health care, and immigration laws, Mitt Romney seems to walk, talk and act like a socialist.

Mitt Romney signed a permanent assault rifle ban as Governor of Massachusetts. Romney has also stated that he would support a federal assault rifle ban as well. While he ran in 2002 for governor, this is what was on his own gubernatorial campaign website:

“Mitt Romney supports the strict enforcement of gun laws. He is a supporter of the federal assault weapons ban. Mitt also believes in the rights of those who hunt to responsibly own and use firearms.”

A cached version of his old website, which the quote was from, can be found here. Supporting the federal assault weapons ban is pretty odd for a conservative considering that even Obama has ruled out ever reinstating an assault rifle ban!

Romney is a staunch supporter of universal health care. As governor, Romney signed a bill into law that required all Massachusetts residents to purchase health insurance and mandated all businesses to provide insurance.  Isn’t government intervention into business contrary to free market principles? If it’s socialism when Barack Obama does it, it’s socialism when Mitt Romney does it. In fact, the Democrats have given Mittney Willard high praise and claim that they used it as inspiration for ObamaCare.  Simply put, “ObamaCare” is “RomneyCare”.

Maybe Mitt isn't your man...

Maybe it's Newt?  Newton Leroy Gingrich - more commonly known as "Newt" Gingrich. How does he qualify to be a conservative?  He doesn't!  Lets set aside that he was driven to resignation over dozens of ethics charges and incompetence... The man who broke his own “Contract with America” is by definition a "socialist."

Newt Gingrich as a US Congressman voted for the creation of the Department of Education. President Ronald Reagan wanted to eliminate this department. The Department of Education recieved exceptional support not only from Newt, but from many noted socialists as well (including Jimmy Carter himself!).

Ronald Reagan was so "fond" of the Dept of Education he said this:

"The budget plan I submit to you on Feb. 8 will realize major savings by dismantling the Department of Education."

It was Gingrich who voted to give communist China “Most Favored Nation” status. Thanks Newt!  China, known for such uplifting atrocities as "The Tianenman Square Intervention," which highlighted a tank running over a protestor (I wonder how they would handle OWS?), now owns over $800 billion in United States debt according to a Department of Treasury Report in the 1st fiscal Quarter of 2009.

In 1994, Newt Gingrich voted to give $166 million of taxpayer money the IRS. This is a government agency that is there specifically to steal your money and redistribute it through government programs.  Newt claims to want to shrink government, but instead, expands it and supports the progressive income tax, which is one of the planks listed in the Communist Manifesto.

Remember NAFTA and GATT in the 1990s?  You can thank your little Maoist buddy Newt for that as well. Under a lame-duck session of Congress, Newt pushed for the unconstitutional North American Free Trade Agreement and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, both of which removed power from the people of the United States and handed it over to an unelected and unsupervised group which mostly consisted of non-Americans. 

I won't even get into his pandering with Representative Nancy Pelosi for environmental protection...

"Oh...I wont vote for them - I am voting for Rick Santorum."  Well...Santorum has a fairly large batch of skeletons in his closet as well.  A closet that any Democrat would envy.  Let's look at Rick's closet...shall we?

- Voted to increase the Social Services Block Grant from $1 billion to $2 billion
- Voted to increase the FHA loan from $170,000 to $197,000.  Also opposed increasing GNMA guaranty from 6 basis points to 12
- Sponsored An amendment to increase Amtrak funds by $550 million
- Voted to use HUD funds for the Joslyn Art Museum (NE), the Stand Up for Animals project (RI) and the Seattle Art Museum’s Olympic Sculpture Project (WA)
- Voted to increase spending on social programs by $7 billion
- Voted to increase NIH funding by $1.6 billion.
- Voted to increase NIH funding by $700 million
- Voted to for a $2 million earmark to renovate the Vulcan Monument (AL)
- Voted for a $1 billion bailout for the steel industry
- Voted against requiring that highway earmarks would come out of a state’s highway allocation
- Voted to allow Market Access Program funds to go to foreign companies.
- Voted to allow OPIC to increase its administrative costs by 50%
- Voted against transferring $20 million from Americorps to veterans.
- Voted for the $140 billion asbestos compensation bill.
- Voted against requiring a uniform medical criteria to ensure asbestos claims were legitimate.
- Voted to make Medicare part B premium subsidies an new entitlement.
- Voted against paying off the debt ($5.6 trillion at the time) within 30 years.
- Voted to give $18 billion to the IMF.
- Voted to raid Social Security instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt.

And what does our Conservative Champ Santorum have to say on the issue of taxes?

- Voted against a flat tax.
- Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for Medicare prescription drugs
- Voted to increase tobacco taxes to fund health insurance subsidies for small businesses.
- Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an $8 billion increase in child health insurance.
- Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an increase in NIH funding.
- Voted twice for internet taxes.
- Voted to allow gas tax revenues to be used to subsidize Amtrak.
- Voted to strike marriage penalty tax relief and instead provide fines on tobacco companies.
- Voted against repealing the Clinton 4.3 cent gas tax increase.
- Voted to increase taxes by $2.3 billion to pay for an Amtrak trust fund.
- Voted to allow welfare to a minor who had a child out of wedlock and who resided with an adult who was on welfare within the previous two years.
- Voted to increase taxes by $9.4 billion to pay for a $9.4 billion increase in student loans.
- Voted to say that AMT patch is more important than capital gains and dividend relief.

The socialism of Rick Santorum is a blemish on the face of conservatism, small government and individual liberty.  He has no business claiming to be a "conservative."

So, what is it going to be?  Each of these candidates could give Obama a run for his money for the "Lenin - Most Improved Comrade" award.  They are no different than what we already have in office. 

I won't be voting for the lesser of two evils in this election.  Once again, I will vote my conscience and it will not be stained after election day 2012.  I will vote for the Congressman from Texas.  The principled and unyeilding Constitutionalist.  The "Good Doctor" himself - Ron Paul.

Will you be holding your nose on election day?  Or will you vote for a real change that will make this nation great again?

Why We Need a Brokered Convention

A brokered convention is where the presidential campaign season comes to a crescendo and there are not enough delegates won during the presidential primary and caucus elections for any one candidate to to get a majority, during the first official round of voting for the party's presidential candidate at its nominating convention. Once that first ballot has been cast and no candidate has a majority of the delegates' votes, the convention is then considered "brokered"; thereafter, the nomination is decided through a process of political arm twisting, bribery, and additional votes being cast. After this first vote resulting in no selection of a nominee occurs, all regular delegates (who, previously, were pledged to the candidate who had won their respective state's primary or caucus election) are "released," and are able to switch their allegiance to a different candidate before the next round of balloting. That is the slightly plagiarized definition according to Wikipedia, anyway.  It is pretty close...

And here is where it is important to us - lovers of liberty.

Contrary to the numbers that are being blown about with every wind of hot-aired ranting by MSM talking heads, the delegate count being assigned to the candidates is only a "W.A.G." That is an acronym for Wild A#%ed Guess. Very few of the states are able to assign their delegates to the winner of the straw poll held on caucus night. And according to Ron Paul's campaign staff, there is every reason to believe that the delegate selection that occurred in many states does not reflect the true number of delegates loyal to the cause of liberty. In other words, it is very possible that Dr. Paul has many more delegates than the MSM would have you believe. And many of the delegates that have to vote for their state's straw poll winner, would be released to vote their conscience in a brokered convention. It is also very likely that many of those delegates are Dr. Paul's as well.

The last brokered Republican convention was in 1948 which led to the selection of Thomas Dewey as the nominee. Otherwise, the last time we came close to a brokered convention was in 1976...the Republican primaries gave President Gerald Ford a slight lead in the popular vote and delegates entering the Republican National Convention, but not enough delegates to secure the nomination. A brokered convention was predicted but Ford managed to receive the necessary support on the first ballot to edge Ronald Reagan. This is the last time a Republican presidential convention opened without the nominee having already been decided in the primaries. As you will recall, Ford was handily beaten by Democrat Jimmy Carter in the election that year.

OK...what does that mean for all of us? Well, you are already, no doubt, seeing all the talking heads and "Republican Leadership" (so-called...) telling the world how disastrous a thing it would be to have a brokered convention, since it would show all the fractures in the Republican Party and that the divisiveness would hand the Presidency back to BHO. "Oh, Lawd!!! If we don't violate our conscience and vote for who they tell us to vote for, the evil will continue! And it will be all our fault for not supporting the establishment!" Of course, this is all utter BS of the highest fertilizer quality. And if you are one of the "tens and tens" of readers who read this blog, then you are probably not swayed by the MSM rhetoric. For those of us who support liberty and the Constitution (namely, Dr. Paul), than what this means is that we have a lot of educatin' of the ignorant masses to do.

So, why do we need a brokered convention? Because it is the only shot we have at overthrowing the establishment's attempt to force a candidate that will continue the madness - it is the only real shot at the People having a voice in these matters. We have a very well oiled, grassroots machine running for Dr. Paul and we have invaded the caucuses and the political system in general. If we can make it to a brokered convention, our candidate has a very real shot at winning the candidacy. It will be the sucker punch to the Republican establishment it so richly deserves. Otherwise, Gingr-Santo-Romney, which is BHO with a different bumper sticker is what we will be stuck with. Make no mistake, to vote for Santorum, Gingrich, or Romney, is simply casting a vote for a Socialist in a different suit. They will be no different that Obama.

Could you imagine the looks on the faces of Brett Baier, Hannity, O'reilly, Limbaugh, Michael Steele and the rest of their ilk? I think that would be worth the price of admission alone...however, we are in the midst of a political revolution for the heart of this Republic. We need to push it to the end...all the way to Tampa.

So, go to http://www.ronpaul2012.com and donate generously to the cause of liberty during our "Give Me Liberty" money bomb and stay the course.  Your Republic is depending on you!

Give me Liberty!  Give me Tampa!  And give me a brokered convention...

An Israeli asks "What is it About Ron Paul?"

What the Ron Paul Supporters have Always Known

Dr. Paul and Racism

Dr. Paul is about as racist as I am a cat lover. The MSM and the Republican establishment (and the Democrats for that matter...) are all worried that Dr. Paul could win. So, what do you do with an honorable and honest contender for the presidency? You slander him in any way you can...well, MSM and everyone else, this boot to the head is just for you!

Ronald Reagan and Why Ron Paul Should be President

Lake Jackson, TX Knows Why Ron Paul!

Locals Say Ron Paul is a Front-runner for a Reason: MyFoxHOUSTON.com

Ron Paul, NDAA, SOPA and the Constitution

Open Letter to Iowans

Ron Paul - The only Republican
I would vote for...

Dear Iowan Voters,

Your Governor recently said that if Dr. Ron Paul were to win the Iowa Caucus that everyone would disregard that win and focus on whoever came in second.  I am not even an Iowan and this really concerns me.

His implication is that even though you choose a candidate, your will as the voter should be ignored.  I hope this bothers you.  I hope this bothers you so much that you race to the caucuses and then stay there until they close to be sure of what your Republican Party officials are doing behind closed doors.  I hope that you ensure the count is accurate. I hope you vote your conscience and I hope you vote for liberty.  But most importantly, I hope you take your voting more seriously than your Governor does.

Why your support of Dr. Paul is so important...

Dr. Paul’s consistent voting record prompted one Congressman to comment that “Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers’ ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.” Another Congresswoman added that “There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.” To put things in another light, Dr. Paul is the real deal.  A real Conservative in the tradition of Barry Goldwater (Conscience of a Conservative) with a voting record in the House of Representatives spanning 30 years to back it up. He has never once voted for anything that violated the Constitution of the United States, which every current candidate has voted to uphold and failed to do so.

Here are his views and the reasons you should strongly consider him as your candidate:

- Foreign Policy/Foreign Aid and Support of Military Personnel
- Federal Reserve
- Life and Abortion
- Domestic Policy/Borders
- Energy Independence
- Gun Rights
- Workers Rights
- Homeschooling
- Budget Plan

Our nation is bankrupt because we have had so many leaders who refuse to uphold their vow to protect and defend the Constitution of these United States. We have, through ignorance or apathy, allowed them to corrupt our nation and its guiding principals.  There is one man, who for the last 30 years has never broken his vow to follow the Constitution and has the voting record to prove it. That man is Ron Paul.  And this is the man that your Governor implies you should ignore.  The press has done everything to marginalize him,  Your own Governor wants to ignore him.  You the people are starting to see the solution by selecting him. Who's opinion is most important?

Do you agree with your Governor's position?  And if you do not, do you want to keep him as your Governor for another term if he is willing to disregard the will of you, The People?

Vote your conscience. Vote for Liberty. Vote for Security.  Vote for your family.  Vote Ron Paul.

(for more on Dr. Ron Paul - here and here)

4 Star General Justifies Dr. Paul's Non-interventionist Foreign Policy

Neil Cavuto defends Ron Paul!

The #1 Video on The Daily Show - Ron Paul vs. the Media!

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

Newest Ron Paul Campaign Ad Dec 2011

Ron Paul and Israel (A Challenge for Christians and Jews)

As a devoted Ron Paul supporter in the current election cycle, I am continuously bombarded with the statement, "I like Ron Paul's ideas, but his foreign policy - especially regarding Israel - I could never support."

Well, let's talk reality...

The United States is broke. B-R-O-K-E...Broke. We have printed fiat currency until it is not even worth the paper it is printed on and we are now in debt to a private bank (the Federal Reserve - about as "federal" as Federal Express) to the tune of a few trillion dollars - that is "trillion with a 'T'."  No matter what position you take on Dr. Paul's foreign policy stance, we cannot afford to have our military overseas in any kind of conflict.  We can't afford to even fix our own national highways, much less guard some other nation's roads.  So, regardless of what you think we should do to Iran, we could not afford to do it.  Period.

Dr. Paul's position on foreign monetary support/foreign aid is real simple.  The Constitution does not allow for it.  So let's stop all of it.  All of the pro-Israel folks get real steamed at that because it would mean stopping financial support to Israel as well as everyone else.  What most of you who don't like this position do not realize is that we give 9 times more support to Israel's avowed enemies than we do to Israel herself.  Further more, Israel doesn't scratch without asking the US for permission.  That is not foreign aid folks.  That is foreign servitude.  We hold Israel back.  And the truth is, Israel is supposed to be a sovereign nation.  Why are we forcing them to do anything (ex.: the "Piece Process" - and yes I intentionally spelled it that way)?  We should be trade partners with Israel.  We should sell her weapons and allow our private security contractors to go there and help train their military (not that they need it).  We should sell goods and supplies to them as well.  When Israel is attacked and we are going to use military force to help them, we should get a declaration for war (Article 1, sec 8 - US Constitution) and then ask if they want our help. 

When Israel bombed the nuclear weapons facility in Osirak, Iraq, the world condemned them (for all you anti-Paul/pro Israel people...Ron Paul was one of the very few in Congress that said Israel had a right to defend themselves when this happened).  They did what they did because they felt a threat.  They have one of the most capable militaries in the world and some of the most advanced weapons.  They flew, they dropped, they flew out and the nuclear facility was no more.  They did not need our help and they certainly did not need our permission.  The same is true today with regards to Iran.  The Bachmann's  of the world would have us send our over-stretched military to yet another country that does not have the capacity to attack us directly (other than the ability to slip through our porous borders which should be guarded by our own military).  But Obama, Bachmann, Perry and the rest want us to go charging into Iran because they might have a weapon of mass distraction in their little Muslim mitts.  And when I say something so horrible as "So what if they get a weapon...?" people immediately respond with, "They will attack Israel!" As if Israel is helpless...  This is the usual response I get from Christians and Jewish people.

Israel's military is arguably the finest in the world.  They have the technology and experience of having enemies on every border since they were founded in 1948.  They also have the resolve to use force in their own defense.  They have over 300 nuclear weapons of their own and the capability to shoot down enemy missiles.  Even larger nations are wary when it comes to Israel and her capacity defend herself.

With all of that in mind, why on earth would you be worried about Israel and Iran? Iran would not stand a chance in a war with Israel.  It would be over in hours if there were an exchange of missiles, and Israel would suffer very little in that fight.

Here is the real challenge is to those of you who are Christians or religious Jews.

Somewhere along the way, you got the idea that America is Israel's protector and Israel cannot deal with her own defense.  In spite of 3 spectacular wars that Israel miraculously pulled off even though outnumbered and outgunned, you think they are helpless.  Why?

Have you ever read Ezekiel 38 and 39? It paints a very clear picture of Israel being attacked by Iran and several middle east allies.  And as you read it you will notice that Israel once again, comes out victorious in a very one sided battle.  And who does it say that intervenes and saves Israel?  Not the good ol' USA... No - it is God Himself.

If you are Christian or Jew, you either believe God will stand with Israel, or you are not really a believer in the Bible and its teachings. Either God is real - or He is a liar...you choose. 

Our foreign policy has caused Israel to become our puppet and caused us to become the enemy of the middle eastern nations that surround Israel.  We have meddled in their affairs and even overthrown govenrments (Iran, Iraq, etc.).  This has resulted in what the CIA calls "blowback." And it is the reason that a bunch of jihadists are willing to fly airplanes into our buildings (see video below).  Dr. Paul brings this up frequently in the debates and is often ignored. We ignore him at our peril...

Ron Paul wants Israel to stand on her own two feet and not be our bartering tool in the Middle East.  He wants to step out of her way and let her defend herself with her very - very capable military.  He wants to conduct trade with her and let them buy our products and visa-versa.  He wants to end all foreign aid, which includes the nine times more money that goes to Israel's enemies. And he wants to bring our troops home to watch our own borders so that we can keep Bachmann's evil terrorists out of the US.